Ad is loading...
HUGPF
Price
$43.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
JNBYF
Price
$1.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

HUGPF vs JNBYF

Header iconHUGPF vs JNBYF Comparison
Open Charts HUGPF vs JNBYFBanner chart's image
Hugo Boss AG
Price$43.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.17K
CapitalizationN/A
JNBY Design
Price$1.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
HUGPF vs JNBYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUGPF vs. JNBYF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUGPF is a Hold and JNBYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HUGPF: $43.67 vs. JNBYF: $1.31)
Brand notoriety: HUGPF and JNBYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUGPF: 55% vs. JNBYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HUGPF: $5.59B vs. JNBYF: $608.53M
HUGPF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $5.59B. JNBYF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $608.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJNBYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HUGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JNBYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUGPF is a better buy in the long-term than JNBYF.

Price Growth

HUGPF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JNBYF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-1.64% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUGPF($5.59B) has a higher market cap than JNBYF($609M). HUGPF has higher P/E ratio than JNBYF: HUGPF (21.01) vs JNBYF (6.45). JNBYF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. HUGPF (-30.162). JNBYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 718M vs. HUGPF (682M). JNBYF has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. HUGPF (137M). JNBYF has less debt than HUGPF: JNBYF (639M) vs HUGPF (757M). JNBYF (3.96B) and HUGPF (3.85B) have equivalent revenues.
HUGPFJNBYFHUGPF / JNBYF
Capitalization5.59B609M918%
EBITDA682M718M95%
Gain YTD-30.1620.000-
P/E Ratio21.016.45326%
Revenue3.85B3.96B97%
Total Cash137M952M14%
Total Debt757M639M118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUGPF: Fundamental Ratings
HUGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMUGX23.680.28
+1.20%
MFS Utilities R1
GARJX9.86N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Global Rl Estt Secs Inv
MINJX40.57-0.23
-0.56%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R6
TSFAX16.00-0.16
-0.99%
Touchstone Small Cap A
FNGDX15.52-0.17
-1.08%
Franklin Intl Growth C

HUGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUGPF and YUEIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUGPF and YUEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUGPF
1D Price
Change %
HUGPF100%
N/A
YUEIF - HUGPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.70%
HMRZF - HUGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNBYF - HUGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - HUGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXSBY - HUGPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JNBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JNBYF and HNNMY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JNBYF and HNNMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JNBYF
1D Price
Change %
JNBYF100%
N/A
HNNMY - JNBYF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
HUGPF - JNBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXSBY - JNBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - JNBYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMRZF - JNBYF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More