Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.29
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.36B vs. HUMDX (12.1M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.50). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. SSGSX (-6.57). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.95 vs. SSGSX (14.10).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.26 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.26 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.532 | -4.932 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1M | 5.36B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.50 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | -6.57 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.32 | -7.36 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.95 | 14.10 | 468% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement