Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.89
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. HUMDX (12.3M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (1.00) vs SSGSX (0.48). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. SSGSX (-4.22). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 77.98 vs. SSGSX (19.51).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.26 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.26 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.423 | 0.237 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3M | 5.44B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.48 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | -4.22 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.02 | 6.47 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.98 | 19.51 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement