Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMEX vs SSGSX
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMEX vs SSGSX
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$16.12
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.4M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.56B
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMEX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.56B vs. HUMEX (12.4M). HUMEX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMEX (1.25) vs SSGSX (0.50). HUMEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMEX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HUMEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMEX (1000000). HUMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. SSGSX (-4.53). HUMEX return over 5 years is better than : 68.34 vs. SSGSX (17.10).
| HUMEX | SSGSX | HUMEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.26 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.810 | -0.991 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4M | 5.56B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.50 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | -4.53 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | -8.81 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.34 | 17.10 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement