HUNGF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.06 (-8.82%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.9B
IBDRY
Price
$72.43
Change
+$0.61 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
77.12B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUNGF vs IBDRY

Header iconHUNGF vs IBDRY Comparison
Open Charts HUNGF vs IBDRYBanner chart's image
Huaneng Power International
Price$0.63
Change-$0.06 (-8.82%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization15.9B
Iberdrola SA
Price$72.43
Change+$0.61 (+0.85%)
Volume$35.19K
Capitalization77.12B
HUNGF vs IBDRY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBDRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUNGF vs. IBDRY commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUNGF is a Hold and IBDRY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HUNGF: $0.63 vs. IBDRY: $72.43)
Brand notoriety: HUNGF and IBDRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUNGF: 18% vs. IBDRY: 41%
Market capitalization -- HUNGF: $15.9B vs. IBDRY: $77.12B
HUNGF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $15.9B. IBDRY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $77.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUNGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBDRY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HUNGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBDRY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBDRY is a better buy in the long-term than HUNGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUNGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBDRY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUNGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IBDRY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HUNGF and IBDRY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HUNGF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +5.93% price change this week, while IBDRY (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBDRY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.17% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBDRY($77.1B) has a higher market cap than HUNGF($15.9B). IBDRY YTD gains are higher at: 40.720 vs. HUNGF (13.636). HUNGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.8B vs. IBDRY (13.8B). HUNGF has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. IBDRY (3.86B). IBDRY has less debt than HUNGF: IBDRY (47.6B) vs HUNGF (295B). HUNGF has higher revenues than IBDRY: HUNGF (256B) vs IBDRY (55.8B).
HUNGFIBDRYHUNGF / IBDRY
Capitalization15.9B77.1B21%
EBITDA36.8B13.8B267%
Gain YTD13.63640.72033%
P/E RatioN/A15.38-
Revenue256B55.8B459%
Total Cash16.9B3.86B437%
Total Debt295B47.6B620%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUNGF vs IBDRY: Fundamental Ratings
HUNGF
IBDRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5417
SMR RATING
1..100
7769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4714
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a13

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUNGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBDRY (55). This means that HUNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBDRY’s over the last 12 months.

IBDRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUNGF (54). This means that IBDRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUNGF’s over the last 12 months.

IBDRY's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HUNGF (77). This means that IBDRY’s stock grew similarly to HUNGF’s over the last 12 months.

IBDRY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HUNGF (53). This means that IBDRY’s stock grew similarly to HUNGF’s over the last 12 months.

IBDRY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUNGF (47). This means that IBDRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUNGFIBDRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBDRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLY224.872.07
+0.93%
The Consumer Discret Sel SectSPDR® ETF
ROM81.070.37
+0.46%
ProShares Ultra Technology
NXTE35.94-0.03
-0.10%
AXS Green Alpha ETF
FLBR16.83-0.13
-0.75%
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
SMN12.95-0.30
-2.29%
ProShares UltraShort Materials

HUNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUNGF and HKCVF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUNGF and HKCVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUNGF
1D Price
Change %
HUNGF100%
N/A
HKCVF - HUNGF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBDRY - HUNGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
IESFY - HUNGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
HRNNF - HUNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
HKVTY - HUNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBDRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBDRY has been closely correlated with ENLAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBDRY jumps, then ENLAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBDRY
1D Price
Change %
IBDRY100%
+0.85%
ENLAY - IBDRY
71%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
EDPFY - IBDRY
66%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
EONGY - IBDRY
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
RDEIY - IBDRY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
SSEZY - IBDRY
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More