HUPHY
Price
$3.74
Change
+$0.05 (+1.36%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
SLOFF
Price
$3.09
Change
+$1.58 (+104.64%)
Updated
Apr 5 closing price
Capitalization
369.83M
Ad is loading...

HUPHY vs SLOFF

Header iconHUPHY vs SLOFF Comparison
Open Charts HUPHY vs SLOFFBanner chart's image
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust
Price$3.74
Change+$0.05 (+1.36%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization1.39B
Solstad Farstad ASA
Price$3.09
Change+$1.58 (+104.64%)
Volume$120
Capitalization369.83M
HUPHY vs SLOFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUPHY vs. SLOFF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUPHY is a Hold and SLOFF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (HUPHY: $3.56 vs. SLOFF: $3.09)
Brand notoriety: HUPHY and SLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUPHY: 100% vs. SLOFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HUPHY: $1.39B vs. SLOFF: $369.83M
HUPHY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.39B. SLOFF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $369.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUPHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLOFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLOFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HUPHY and SLOFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

HUPHY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLOFF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.17% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUPHY($1.39B) has a higher market cap than SLOFF($370M). SLOFF has higher P/E ratio than HUPHY: SLOFF (795.29) vs HUPHY (19.50). HUPHY YTD gains are higher at: 0.268 vs. SLOFF (0.000). HUPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.04B vs. SLOFF (2.36B). HUPHY has higher revenues than SLOFF: HUPHY (11.2B) vs SLOFF (4.97B).
HUPHYSLOFFHUPHY / SLOFF
Capitalization1.39B370M377%
EBITDA7.04B2.36B298%
Gain YTD0.2680.000-
P/E Ratio19.50795.292%
Revenue11.2B4.97B225%
Total CashN/A561M-
Total DebtN/A5.96B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
SLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBCRX10.230.15
+1.49%
RBC China Equity R6
SGQCX39.30-0.54
-1.36%
DWS International Growth C
GSPSX30.34-0.58
-1.88%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Svc
ASVRX10.10-0.24
-2.32%
American Century Small Cap Value R
AASOX16.83-0.63
-3.61%
Alger Small Cap Growth I-2

HUPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUPHY and SLOFF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUPHY and SLOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUPHY
1D Price
Change %
HUPHY100%
N/A
SLOFF - HUPHY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITIY - HUPHY
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
SEMUF - HUPHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - HUPHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTAUY - HUPHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLOFF has been loosely correlated with IRCUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLOFF jumps, then IRCUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLOFF
1D Price
Change %
SLOFF100%
N/A
IRCUF - SLOFF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SEMUF - SLOFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUPHY - SLOFF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTAUY - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More