Ad is loading...
HUSEX vs SSGSX
HUSEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUSEX vs SSGSX
Huber Small Cap Value Instl
Price$24.29
Change+$0.36 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.47M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
HUSEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUSEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUSEX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. HUSEX (69.5M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than HUSEX: SSGSX (0.52) vs HUSEX (0.44). HUSEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUSEX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HUSEX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HUSEX (30.55). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUSEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUSEX (1000000). HUSEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.91 vs. SSGSX (-15.28). HUSEX return over 5 years is better than : 89.82 vs. SSGSX (22.94).
| HUSEX | SSGSX | HUSEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.967 | -14.430 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.5M | 5.29B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.52 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.91 | -15.28 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.34 | -16.96 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.82 | 22.94 | 391% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.25 | 1.36 | 3,768% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers