Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUSIX vs WCMFX
HUSIX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts HUSIX vs WCMFX
Huber Small Cap Value I
Price$28.54
Change+$0.23 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.16M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.83
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.78M
HUSIX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUSIX vs. WCMFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUSIX is a StrongBuy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUSIX has more cash in the bank: 85.2M vs. WCMFX (61.8M). HUSIX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: HUSIX (0.11) vs WCMFX (0.00). HUSIX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: HUSIX (18 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). HUSIX (1.79) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). HUSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.55 vs. WCMFX (15.00). HUSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: HUSIX (5000) vs WCMFX (100000). HUSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. WCMFX (-12.15). HUSIX return over 5 years is better than : 102.21 vs. WCMFX (34.80).
| HUSIX | WCMFX | HUSIX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.90 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.45 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.281 | -0.417 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.2M | 61.8M | 138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | -12.15 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.43 | 20.63 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.21 | 34.80 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement