HUSQF
Price
$5.43
Change
-$0.13 (-2.34%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
IMIAF
Price
$29.50
Change
+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUSQF vs IMIAF

Header iconHUSQF vs IMIAF Comparison
Open Charts HUSQF vs IMIAFBanner chart's image
Husqvarna AB
Price$5.43
Change-$0.13 (-2.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.28B
IMI
Price$29.50
Change+$0.15 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization7.66B
HUSQF vs IMIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUSQF vs. IMIAF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUSQF is a Hold and IMIAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HUSQF: $5.43 vs. IMIAF: $29.50)
Brand notoriety: HUSQF and IMIAF are both not notable
HUSQF represents the Tools & Hardware, while IMIAF is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUSQF: 31% vs. IMIAF: 172%
Market capitalization -- HUSQF: $3.28B vs. IMIAF: $7.66B
HUSQF [@Tools & Hardware] is valued at $3.28B. IMIAF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $7.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $23.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $6.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUSQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMIAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUSQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IMIAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMIAF is a better buy in the long-term than HUSQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUSQF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMIAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUSQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IMIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUSQF is a better buy in the short-term than IMIAF.

Price Growth

HUSQF (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IMIAF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.09%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tools & Hardware (+0.43% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

@Industrial Machinery (+3.12% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMIAF($7.66B) has a higher market cap than HUSQF($3.28B). IMIAF (23.50) and HUSQF (23.37) have similar P/E ratio . IMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 25.151 vs. HUSQF (4.423). HUSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.41B vs. IMIAF (471M). HUSQF has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. IMIAF (124M). IMIAF has less debt than HUSQF: IMIAF (859M) vs HUSQF (14B). HUSQF has higher revenues than IMIAF: HUSQF (48.2B) vs IMIAF (2.2B).
HUSQFIMIAFHUSQF / IMIAF
Capitalization3.28B7.66B43%
EBITDA2.41B471M511%
Gain YTD4.42325.15118%
P/E Ratio23.3723.5099%
Revenue48.2B2.2B2,188%
Total Cash3.48B124M2,802%
Total Debt14B859M1,630%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUSQF vs IMIAF: Fundamental Ratings
HUSQF
IMIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3549
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
8441
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUSQF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMIAF (52). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

IMIAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUSQF (100). This means that IMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.

IMIAF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUSQF (84). This means that IMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.

IMIAF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSQF (58). This means that IMIAF’s stock grew similarly to HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.

IMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSQF (50). This means that IMIAF’s stock grew similarly to HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUSQFIMIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UCYB57.511.48
+2.64%
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
FTGS35.150.18
+0.51%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
FTF6.420.01
+0.16%
Franklin Limited
HYXU54.83-0.05
-0.10%
iShares International High Yield Bd ETF
IBGL24.09-0.03
-0.12%
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF

HUSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUSQF has been loosely correlated with MKMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUSQF jumps, then MKMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUSQF
1D Price
Change %
HUSQF100%
N/A
MKMLF - HUSQF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VOYJF - HUSQF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMR - HUSQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
IMIAF - HUSQF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNYJF - HUSQF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMIAF has been loosely correlated with MCRUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMIAF jumps, then MCRUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMIAF
1D Price
Change %
IMIAF100%
N/A
MCRUF - IMIAF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QUTIF - IMIAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYKF - IMIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUSQF - IMIAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTWF - IMIAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More