HUT
Price
$26.47
Change
-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.8B
SWIN
Price
$3.87
Change
-$0.12 (-3.01%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
227.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs SWIN

Header iconHUT vs SWIN Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs SWINBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$26.47
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
Volume$9.4K
Capitalization2.8B
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
Price$3.87
Change-$0.12 (-3.01%)
Volume$400
Capitalization227.77M
HUT vs SWIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. SWIN commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and SWIN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $26.51 vs. SWIN: $3.99)
Brand notoriety: HUT and SWIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 82% vs. SWIN: 89%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $2.8B vs. SWIN: $227.77M
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.8B. SWIN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $227.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HUT and SWIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HUT and SWIN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +24.05% price change this week, while SWIN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -7.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.08% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($2.8B) has a higher market cap than SWIN($228M). HUT has higher P/E ratio than SWIN: HUT (18.54) vs SWIN (14.32). SWIN YTD gains are higher at: 141.818 vs. HUT (29.380).
HUTSWINHUT / SWIN
Capitalization2.8B228M1,227%
EBITDA367MN/A-
Gain YTD29.380141.81821%
P/E Ratio18.5414.32130%
Revenue550MN/A-
Total Cash216MN/A-
Total Debt362MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTSWIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMCX8.720.04
+0.46%
Royce Micro-Cap Consult
IGIFX44.150.14
+0.32%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc F1
MURRX24.57N/A
N/A
MFS Utilities R2
TOLIX16.56N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst
MIGPX19.48N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Insgt A

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
+0.61%
RIOT - HUT
81%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
HIVE - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
CIFR - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
IREN - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+3.06%
BITF - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
More

SWIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWIN and TOP have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWIN and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWIN
1D Price
Change %
SWIN100%
+1.79%
TOP - SWIN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MAUSY - SWIN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGL - SWIN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
HUT - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
CIFR - SWIN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More