HUT
Price
$17.66
Change
-$1.02 (-5.46%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
985.18M
SWIN
Price
$3.22
Change
+$0.16 (+5.23%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
87.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs SWIN

Header iconHUT vs SWIN Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs SWINBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$17.66
Change-$1.02 (-5.46%)
Volume$139.06K
Capitalization985.18M
Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share
Price$3.22
Change+$0.16 (+5.23%)
Volume$375
Capitalization87.08M
HUT vs SWIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. SWIN commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Buy and SWIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $18.68 vs. SWIN: $3.06)
Brand notoriety: HUT and SWIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 139% vs. SWIN: 123%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $985.18M vs. SWIN: $87.08M
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $985.18M. SWIN’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $87.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HUT and SWIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWIN is a better buy in the short-term than HUT.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +9.69% price change this week, while SWIN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +50.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.18% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($985M) has a higher market cap than SWIN($87.1M). SWIN has higher P/E ratio than HUT: SWIN (67.46) vs HUT (12.84). SWIN YTD gains are higher at: 85.455 vs. HUT (-8.834).
HUTSWINHUT / SWIN
Capitalization985M87.1M1,131%
EBITDA-80.09MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.83485.455-10%
P/E Ratio12.8467.4619%
Revenue77MN/A-
Total Cash21.1MN/A-
Total Debt79.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTSWIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRNY38.260.85
+2.26%
Severn Trent PLC
TDRRF0.380.01
+2.08%
TUDOR GOLD CORP NEW
FRFHF1787.777.77
+0.44%
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
ADYEY17.97-0.39
-2.12%
Adyen N.V.
AKEMF0.06N/A
-2.34%
ALASKA ENERGY METALS CORP.

SWIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWIN and TOP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWIN and TOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWIN
1D Price
Change %
SWIN100%
+5.88%
TOP - SWIN
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
MAUSY - SWIN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEGL - SWIN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
HIVE - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
HUT - SWIN
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
More