HVGDF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.41M
IEGCF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
24.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVGDF vs IEGCF

Header iconHVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts HVGDF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
Harvest Gold
Price$0.09
Change+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Volume$10.59K
Capitalization6.41M
Independence Gold
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$69.42K
Capitalization24.52M
HVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVGDF vs. IEGCF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVGDF is a Hold and IEGCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HVGDF: $0.09 vs. IEGCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: HVGDF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVGDF: 7% vs. IEGCF: 22%
Market capitalization -- HVGDF: $6.41M vs. IEGCF: $24.52M
HVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.41M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than HVGDF.

Price Growth

HVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.00% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +17.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4660.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEGCF($24.5M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($6.41M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 350.000 vs. IEGCF (-13.333). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -401.82K vs. IEGCF (-7.22M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 7.49M vs. HVGDF (190K). HVGDF (0) and IEGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HVGDFIEGCFHVGDF / IEGCF
Capitalization6.41M24.5M26%
EBITDA-401.82K-7.22M6%
Gain YTD350.000-13.333-2,625%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash190K7.49M3%
Total DebtN/A217K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVGDF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
HVGDF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (61). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (98). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (55). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVGDFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRPRF53.102.60
+5.15%
DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
BBAJF2.23N/A
N/A
Banco Del Bajio
SWGAF191.59N/A
N/A
Swatch Group AG
EDCFF0.20N/A
N/A
ENEL GENERACION COSTANERA S A
WPNDF0.13N/A
N/A
Wishpond Technologies Ltd.

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and CRCUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and CRCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+50.00%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRVRF - HVGDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
IEGCF - HVGDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEGCF has been loosely correlated with DRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEGCF jumps, then DRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
+6.43%
DRD - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
SA - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
NFGC - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
IAG - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
PAAS - IEGCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More