HVGDF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.73M
IRVRF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
12.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVGDF vs IRVRF

Header iconHVGDF vs IRVRF Comparison
Open Charts HVGDF vs IRVRFBanner chart's image
Harvest Gold
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.73M
Irving Resources
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$126.38K
Capitalization12.05M
HVGDF vs IRVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVGDF vs. IRVRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVGDF is a Hold and IRVRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HVGDF: $0.07 vs. IRVRF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: HVGDF and IRVRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVGDF: 0% vs. IRVRF: 298%
Market capitalization -- HVGDF: $5.73M vs. IRVRF: $12.05M
HVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.73M. IRVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIRVRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IRVRF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRVRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IRVRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVGDF is a better buy in the short-term than IRVRF.

Price Growth

HVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IRVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.86% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRVRF($12.1M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($5.73M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 250.000 vs. IRVRF (-17.268). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -401.82K vs. IRVRF (-4.68M). IRVRF has more cash in the bank: 3.22M vs. HVGDF (190K). HVGDF (0) and IRVRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HVGDFIRVRFHVGDF / IRVRF
Capitalization5.73M12.1M47%
EBITDA-401.82K-4.68M9%
Gain YTD250.000-17.268-1,448%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash190K3.22M6%
Total DebtN/A149K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVGDF vs IRVRF: Fundamental Ratings
HVGDF
IRVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (72). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (65). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVGDFIRVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTG15.080.48
+3.29%
Intergroup Corp
HCA407.282.23
+0.55%
HCA Healthcare
UTZ13.41-0.08
-0.59%
Utz Brands
MBCN31.08-0.19
-0.61%
Middlefield Banc Corp
SAIC117.84-1.50
-1.26%
Science Applications International Corp

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and CRCUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and CRCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+7.69%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-20.00%
IRVRF - HVGDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
IEGCF - HVGDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
-0.73%
NEM - IRVRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
USAU - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
BTG - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
THM - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
FSXLF - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More