HVGDF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.41M
IRVRF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
15.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVGDF vs IRVRF

Header iconHVGDF vs IRVRF Comparison
Open Charts HVGDF vs IRVRFBanner chart's image
Harvest Gold
Price$0.09
Change+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Volume$10.59K
Capitalization6.41M
Irving Resources
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$27.5K
Capitalization15.77M
HVGDF vs IRVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVGDF vs. IRVRF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVGDF is a Hold and IRVRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HVGDF: $0.09 vs. IRVRF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: HVGDF and IRVRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVGDF: 7% vs. IRVRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- HVGDF: $6.41M vs. IRVRF: $15.77M
HVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $6.41M. IRVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIRVRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IRVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HVGDF and IRVRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRVRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IRVRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVGDF is a better buy in the short-term than IRVRF.

Price Growth

HVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.00% price change this week, while IRVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4660.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IRVRF($15.8M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($6.41M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 350.000 vs. IRVRF (-1.494). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -401.82K vs. IRVRF (-951.35K). IRVRF has more cash in the bank: 4.62M vs. HVGDF (190K). HVGDF (0) and IRVRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HVGDFIRVRFHVGDF / IRVRF
Capitalization6.41M15.8M41%
EBITDA-401.82K-951.35K42%
Gain YTD350.000-1.494-23,433%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash190K4.62M4%
Total DebtN/A122K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVGDF vs IRVRF: Fundamental Ratings
HVGDF
IRVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
163
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3765
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IRVRF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVGDF (61). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IRVRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (95). This means that IRVRF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (65). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IRVRF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IRVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVGDFIRVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IRVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUGO26.250.71
+2.78%
Aura Minerals Inc
HLVX2.070.01
+0.24%
HilleVax
VYNE0.36-0.02
-5.36%
VYNE Therapeutics
PLAY23.89-1.80
-7.01%
Dave & Buster's Entertainment

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and CRCUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and CRCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+50.00%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRVRF - HVGDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
IEGCF - HVGDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%

IRVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IRVRF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IRVRF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IRVRF
1D Price
Change %
IRVRF100%
+5.06%
NEM - IRVRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
USAU - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
BTG - IRVRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
THM - IRVRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
FSXLF - IRVRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
More