HWAUF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.64M
SLVMF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
162.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWAUF vs SLVMF

Header iconHWAUF vs SLVMF Comparison
Open Charts HWAUF vs SLVMFBanner chart's image
Headwater Gold
Price$0.28
Change+$0.01 (+3.70%)
Volume$38.69K
Capitalization19.64M
Silver Mines Ltd., Sydney
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization162.9M
HWAUF vs SLVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWAUF vs. SLVMF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWAUF is a Hold and SLVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HWAUF: $0.28 vs. SLVMF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: HWAUF and SLVMF are both not notable
HWAUF represents the Precious Metals, while SLVMF is part of the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWAUF: 73% vs. SLVMF: 131%
Market capitalization -- HWAUF: $19.64M vs. SLVMF: $162.9M
HWAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.64M. SLVMF’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $162.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVMF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWAUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLVMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVMF is a better buy in the short-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

HWAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.04% price change this week, while SLVMF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was -17.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.85% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVMF($163M) has a higher market cap than HWAUF($19.6M). HWAUF YTD gains are higher at: 86.773 vs. SLVMF (53.057). SLVMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.44M vs. HWAUF (-4.11M). SLVMF has higher revenues than HWAUF: SLVMF (179K) vs HWAUF (0).
HWAUFSLVMFHWAUF / SLVMF
Capitalization19.6M163M12%
EBITDA-4.11M-3.44M120%
Gain YTD86.77353.057164%
P/E Ratio21.18N/A-
Revenue0179K-
Total Cash2.18MN/A-
Total Debt180KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWAUFSLVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCLTF86.91N/A
N/A
Nitori Holdings Co., Ltd.
GWLL0.20N/A
N/A
GOLDENWELL BIOTECH INC.
ESGRF23.50N/A
N/A
Enstar Group Limited
ARSSF0.63N/A
N/A
Assura Plc
VNWTF7.56N/A
N/A
Vecima Networks Inc.

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and NFGC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and NFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+5.23%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
ABMBF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.67%
TORXF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
EQX - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More

SLVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVMF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVMF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVMF
1D Price
Change %
SLVMF100%
-31.54%
AUMBF - SLVMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
LNCLF - SLVMF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
HWAUF - SLVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.23%
RDYFF - SLVMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More