Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWAZX vs VMVIX
HWAZX vs VMVIX Comparison
Open Charts HWAZX vs VMVIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$42.86
Change+$0.21 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets788.5M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Investor
Price$68.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.47B
HWAZX vs VMVIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWAZX vs. VMVIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWAZX is a Buy and VMVIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVIX has more cash in the bank: 32.5B vs. HWAZX (789M). VMVIX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: VMVIX (2.05) vs HWAZX (1.11). HWAZX was incepted earlier than VMVIX: HWAZX (6 years) vs VMVIX (19 years). HWAZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VMVIX (0.19). HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VMVIX (19.00). VMVIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: VMVIX (3000) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.10 vs. VMVIX (5.47). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 82.58 vs. VMVIX (64.84).
| HWAZX | VMVIX | HWAZX / VMVIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.19 | 453% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.19 | 453% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.098 | 7.956 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 789M | 32.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 5.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.99 | 42.03 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.58 | 64.84 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement