HWC
Price
$47.63
Change
+$1.02 (+2.19%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
4B
Earnings call today
MCB
Price
$50.76
Change
+$1.25 (+2.52%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
404.02M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HWC vs MCB

Header iconHWC vs MCB Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs MCBBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$47.63
Change+$1.02 (+2.19%)
Volume$915.71K
Capitalization4B
Metropolitan Bank Holding
Price$50.76
Change+$1.25 (+2.52%)
Volume$80.53K
Capitalization404.02M
HWC vs MCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. MCB commentary
Apr 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Hold and MCB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $47.63 vs. MCB: $50.76)
Brand notoriety: HWC and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 116% vs. MCB: 72%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. MCB: $404.02M
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $404.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than MCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HWC and MCB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.52% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than MCB($404M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than MCB: HWC (9.98) vs MCB (5.27). HWC YTD gains are higher at: -12.232 vs. MCB (-13.082). MCB has less debt than HWC: MCB (547M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than MCB: HWC (1.37B) vs MCB (251M).
HWCMCBHWC / MCB
Capitalization4B404M991%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.232-13.08294%
P/E Ratio9.985.27189%
Revenue1.37B251M545%
Total Cash561MN/A-
Total Debt1.52B547M277%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2470
SMR RATING
1..100
810
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCB's Valuation (32) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCB (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (10) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QKACX41.17N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
TWEAX8.22N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income A
VNSAX19.59N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select A
CLTAX14.54N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A
BLYPX28.15N/A
N/A
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth Inv

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+2.19%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More