HWC
Price
$56.76
Change
+$0.85 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 26, 02:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4B
19 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$18.88
Change
+$0.22 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs SFNC

Header iconHWC vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$56.76
Change+$0.85 (+1.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4B
Simmons First National
Price$18.88
Change+$0.22 (+1.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.42B
HWC vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $55.91 vs. SFNC: $18.66)
Brand notoriety: HWC and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 52% vs. SFNC: 114%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. SFNC: $2.42B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.29% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.62% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than SFNC($2.42B). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than HWC: SFNC (13.98) vs HWC (9.98). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 3.889 vs. SFNC (-14.014). HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. SFNC (345M). SFNC has less debt than HWC: SFNC (1.34B) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than SFNC: HWC (1.37B) vs SFNC (782M).
HWCSFNCHWC / SFNC
Capitalization4B2.42B166%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.889-14.014-28%
P/E Ratio9.9813.9871%
Revenue1.37B782M175%
Total Cash561M345M163%
Total Debt1.52B1.34B113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2373
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFNC's Valuation (24) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (73) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (12) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSMVX39.49N/A
N/A
North Star Micro Cap I
JSEQX52.79N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R4
REREX57.81-0.15
-0.26%
American Funds EUPAC R4
STSRX15.06-0.04
-0.26%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr R6
WSCYX19.58-0.23
-1.16%
Macquarie Small Cap Growth Y

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-1.01%
UBSI - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
HOPE - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
UCB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
HWC - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
FFBC - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More