HWC
Price
$63.12
Change
-$0.40 (-0.63%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.35B
53 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$122.25
Change
-$0.74 (-0.60%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
9.28B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs UMBF

Header iconHWC vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$63.12
Change-$0.40 (-0.63%)
Volume$453.48K
Capitalization5.35B
UMB Financial
Price$122.25
Change-$0.74 (-0.60%)
Volume$323.65K
Capitalization9.28B
HWC vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. UMBF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Buy and UMBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $63.12 vs. UMBF: $122.25)
Brand notoriety: HWC and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 61% vs. UMBF: 54%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $5.35B vs. UMBF: $9.28B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.35B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than UMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMBF($9.28B) has a higher market cap than HWC($5.35B). UMBF has higher P/E ratio than HWC: UMBF (13.84) vs HWC (11.65). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 17.287 vs. UMBF (9.150). UMBF has more cash in the bank: 917M vs. HWC (510M). UMBF has less debt than HWC: UMBF (439M) vs HWC (849M). UMBF has higher revenues than HWC: UMBF (1.9B) vs HWC (1.47B).
HWCUMBFHWC / UMBF
Capitalization5.35B9.28B58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.2879.150189%
P/E Ratio11.6513.8484%
Revenue1.47B1.9B77%
Total Cash510M917M56%
Total Debt849M439M193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5582
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1931
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (60). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (31). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (100). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (46). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (100). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EALCX45.43N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Growth A
ESPNX40.53N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Inst
CFIAX14.70N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income A
MSAYX23.15N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp R6
VTMGX18.88N/A
N/A
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.63%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
UCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
ONB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
FULT - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
-0.61%
FNB - UMBF
91%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
HWC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
WTFC - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
ONB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
FULT - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
More