HWC
Price
$54.12
Change
-$1.00 (-1.81%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
4B
47 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$101.45
Change
-$0.54 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jun 5, 10:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.12B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs UMBF

Header iconHWC vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$54.12
Change-$1.00 (-1.81%)
Volume$380.21K
Capitalization4B
UMB Financial
Price$101.45
Change-$0.54 (-0.53%)
Volume$500
Capitalization4.12B
HWC vs UMBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. UMBF commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Hold and UMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $54.12 vs. UMBF: $101.99)
Brand notoriety: HWC and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 55% vs. UMBF: 75%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. UMBF: $4.12B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.19% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMBF($4.12B) and HWC($4B) have the same market capitalization . UMBF has higher P/E ratio than HWC: UMBF (11.78) vs HWC (9.98). HWC YTD gains are higher at: -0.273 vs. UMBF (-9.279). HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. UMBF (447M). UMBF has less debt than HWC: UMBF (1.38B) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC (1.37B) and UMBF (1.33B) have equivalent revenues.
HWCUMBFHWC / UMBF
Capitalization4B4.12B97%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.273-9.2793%
P/E Ratio9.9811.7885%
Revenue1.37B1.33B103%
Total Cash561M447M126%
Total Debt1.52B1.38B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2336
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6128
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (69). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (36). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (8). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (53). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (61). This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNOM8.140.22
+2.78%
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
SAY25.310.07
+0.28%
Saratoga Investment Corp
JPEF67.900.01
+0.01%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
UVXY21.34-0.13
-0.61%
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures
TOLZ54.40-0.41
-0.75%
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infras

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-1.81%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
ASB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
SNV - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
UBSI - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.57%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
-1.51%
FNB - UMBF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
HWC - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
PNFP - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
SNV - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
ABCB - UMBF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
More