Ad is loading...
HWGAX vs TEDIX
HWGAX vs TEDIX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$14.51
Change+$0.20 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.06M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery A
Price$29.05
Change+$0.30 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.61B
HWGAX vs TEDIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDIX has more cash in the bank: 8.61B vs. HWGAX (36.1M). TEDIX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: TEDIX (1.77) vs HWGAX (1.10). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDIX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDIX (32 years). HWGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TEDIX (1.21). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDIX (35.47). TEDIX (6%) and HWGAX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TEDIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDIX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.47 vs. HWGAX (-6.71). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.02 vs. TEDIX (36.02).
| HWGAX | TEDIX | HWGAX / TEDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.21 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.21 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.507 | 3.529 | 71% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 95% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 8.61B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | -4.47 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | -1.64 | -179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.02 | 36.02 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.87 | -11.19 | -213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers