Ad is loading...
HWGAX vs TEDRX
HWGAX vs TEDRX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDRX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$14.88
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.19M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
Price$29.62
Change+$0.13 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.09B
HWGAX vs TEDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDRX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.09B vs. HWGAX (37.2M). TEDRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: TEDRX (1.56) vs HWGAX (1.10). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDRX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDRX (23 years). HWGAX (1.51) and TEDRX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDRX (35.47). TEDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDRX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. HWGAX (-4.13). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 112.21 vs. TEDRX (52.97).
| HWGAX | TEDRX | HWGAX / TEDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.46 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.46 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.017 | 8.339 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 9.09B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.13 | -1.75 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.02 | 0.47 | 430% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.21 | 52.97 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.28 | -6.48 | -498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...