Ad is loading...
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$14.88
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.19M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$30.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.09B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.09B vs. HWGAX (37.2M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.10) vs TEDSX (0.92). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.51). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.97 vs. HWGAX (-4.13). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 112.21 vs. TEDSX (52.35).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.017 | 8.194 | 73% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 9.09B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.92 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.13 | -1.97 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.02 | 0.24 | 838% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.21 | 52.35 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.28 | -6.36 | -507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...