Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$16.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.07M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.42B vs. HWGAX (40.1M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.00) vs TEDSX (0.86). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.51). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). HWGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. TEDSX (3.72). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 78.22 vs. TEDSX (33.65).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.553 | 16.993 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1M | 9.42B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.86 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.20 | 3.72 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.63 | 20.95 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.22 | 33.65 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.67 | 11.75 | 500% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement