Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$15.76
Change+$0.12 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.92M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.59
Change+$0.21 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.14B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. HWGAX (38.9M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.05) vs TEDSX (0.90). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.51). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.49 vs. HWGAX (3.21). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.21 vs. TEDSX (31.48).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.894 | 12.540 | 103% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.9M | 9.14B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 3.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.55 | 10.99 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.21 | 31.48 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.51 | -1.84 | -2,197% |