Ad is loading...
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$14.51
Change+$0.20 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.06M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$29.29
Change+$0.30 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.61B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.61B vs. HWGAX (36.1M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.10) vs TEDSX (0.92). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.51). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. HWGAX (-6.71). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.02 vs. TEDSX (33.67).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.507 | 3.278 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 8.61B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.92 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | -5.12 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | -2.76 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.02 | 33.67 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.87 | -12.75 | -187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers