Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$15.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.38M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.08B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.08B vs. HWGAX (38.4M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.06) vs TEDSX (0.91). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.51). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HWGAX (0.72). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.77 vs. TEDSX (31.95).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.96 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.96 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.315 | 10.331 | 100% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.4M | 9.08B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.91 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.72 | 2.09 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.18 | 13.85 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.77 | 31.95 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.39 | -5.02 | -685% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers