Ad is loading...
HWGIX vs TEDSX
HWGIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGIX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value I
Price$14.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.11M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$28.54
Change+$0.19 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
HWGIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGIX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.44B vs. HWGIX (35.1M). HWGIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGIX (1.33) vs TEDSX (0.92). HWGIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGIX (12 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGIX (1.24). HWGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TEDSX (35.47). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGIX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGIX (250000). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.93 vs. HWGIX (-6.13). HWGIX return over 5 years is better than : 80.91 vs. TEDSX (28.13).
| HWGIX | TEDSX | HWGIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.96 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.072 | 0.998 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 8.44B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.92 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | -4.93 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.34 | -5.54 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.91 | 28.13 | 288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.96 | -14.25 | -168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers