Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLIX vs RMEBX
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value I
Price$43.21
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.03M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
HWLIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWLIX (363M). HWLIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLIX (1.49) vs RMEBX (1.11). HWLIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLIX (38 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWLIX (0.98). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HWLIX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. HWLIX (0.84). HWLIX return over 5 years is better than : 57.57 vs. RMEBX (51.78).
| HWLIX | RMEBX | HWLIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.234 | 9.513 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.11 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.84 | 9.12 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.51 | 21.70 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.57 | 51.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.98 | 76.00 | 104% |