Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLZX vs RMEBX
HWLZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLZX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$46.22
Change-$0.32 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.24
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
HWLZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. HWLZX (379M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWLZX (1.51) vs RMEBX (1.09). HWLZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWLZX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWLZX (0.85). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HWLZX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: RMEBX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. HWLZX (3.82). HWLZX return over 5 years is better than : 84.62 vs. RMEBX (61.00).
| HWLZX | RMEBX | HWLZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.852 | 12.407 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.09 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 5.89 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.90 | 39.94 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.62 | 61.00 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement