Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLZX vs RWEBX
HWLZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWLZX vs RWEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$45.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
HWLZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLZX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. HWLZX (347M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: HWLZX (1.50) vs RWEBX (0.76). HWLZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: HWLZX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HWLZX (0.85). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: RWEBX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.20 vs. HWLZX (-3.02). HWLZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RWEBX (39.61).
| HWLZX | RWEBX | HWLZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.06 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.209 | 7.797 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.76 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.02 | 3.20 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 26.70 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 39.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers