Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWLZX vs RWMHX
HWLZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts HWLZX vs RWMHX
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$45.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$65.89
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
HWLZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWLZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWLZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. HWLZX (347M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: HWLZX (1.50) vs RWMHX (1.33). HWLZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: HWLZX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: RWMHX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.91 vs. HWLZX (-3.02). HWLZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. RWMHX (43.18).
| HWLZX | RWMHX | HWLZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.41 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.209 | 8.429 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.33 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.02 | 3.91 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 29.08 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 43.18 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers