Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs JVMCX
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs JVMCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$55.68
Change-$0.28 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets361.67M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. HWMZX (362M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HWMZX (1.25) vs JVMCX (0.00). HWMZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HWMZX (6 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. HWMZX (31.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: JVMCX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.16 vs. JVMCX (-7.96). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 101.64 vs. JVMCX (26.91).
| HWMZX | JVMCX | HWMZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.85 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.098 | 6.877 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 23.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.16 | -7.96 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.80 | 9.36 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.64 | 26.91 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement