Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs VEVYX
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs VEVYX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$57.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets390.57M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$46.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.17B
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. VEVYX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17.2B vs. HWMZX (391M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than VEVYX: HWMZX (1.24) vs VEVYX (1.06). HWMZX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: HWMZX (6 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). HWMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. HWMZX (28.00). HWMZX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. VEVYX (-8.72). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 155.94 vs. VEVYX (38.54).
| HWMZX | VEVYX | HWMZX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.273 | 2.550 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 391M | 17.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.06 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | -8.72 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.58 | 6.72 | 560% |
| Returns for 5 years | 155.94 | 38.54 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement