Ad is loading...
HWMZX vs VMVAX
HWMZX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs VMVAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$48.26
Change+$1.06 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.03M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$80.42
Change+$1.08 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.86B
HWMZX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. VMVAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a StrongBuy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 29.9B vs. HWMZX (343M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than HWMZX: VMVAX (2.33) vs HWMZX (1.37). HWMZX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: HWMZX (6 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). HWMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). HWMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VMVAX (22.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: VMVAX (3000) vs HWMZX (1000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.10 vs. HWMZX (-12.01). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 162.23 vs. VMVAX (76.23).
| HWMZX | VMVAX | HWMZX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.884 | -5.253 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 29.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 2.33 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.01 | 2.10 | -571% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.94 | 4.97 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 162.23 | 76.23 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...