Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSIX vs SSGSX
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSIX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
Price$77.65
Change+$0.14 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets791.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSIX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HWSIX (792M). HWSIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSIX (0.98) vs SSGSX (0.47). HWSIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSIX (40 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSIX (1.05). HWSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSIX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSIX (250000). HWSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.63 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). HWSIX return over 5 years is better than : 89.24 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| HWSIX | SSGSX | HWSIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.424 | 2.046 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 5.64B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.47 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | -1.56 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.26 | 3.97 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.24 | 22.95 | 389% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.82 | 24.71 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement