Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSIX vs SSGSX
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSIX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
Price$74.69
Change+$0.74 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.58M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.61
Change+$0.66 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.32B
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSIX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.32B vs. HWSIX (720M). HWSIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSIX (0.99) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSIX (40 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSIX (1.06). HWSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSIX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSIX (250000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.99 vs. HWSIX (-8.67). HWSIX return over 5 years is better than : 78.07 vs. SSGSX (18.36).
| HWSIX | SSGSX | HWSIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.551 | -1.034 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 720M | 5.32B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.48 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.67 | -7.99 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | 1.38 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.07 | 18.36 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.76 | 18.52 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement