Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSZX vs SSGSX
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
Price$77.38
Change-$0.28 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets789.24M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HWSZX (789M). HWSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSZX (1.09) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSZX (0.86). HWSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSZX (1000000). HWSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.89 vs. SSGSX (-3.93). HWSZX return over 5 years is better than : 89.36 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| HWSZX | SSGSX | HWSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.466 | 1.852 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 789M | 5.63B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.50 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.89 | -3.93 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.36 | -0.85 | -632% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.36 | 20.68 | 432% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement