Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSZX vs SSGSX
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSZX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z
Price$76.95
Change+$0.64 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.89
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
HWSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. HWSZX (753M). HWSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSZX (1.05) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSZX (6 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSZX (0.86). HWSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSZX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSZX (1000000). HWSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.34 vs. SSGSX (-4.22). HWSZX return over 5 years is better than : 84.97 vs. SSGSX (19.51).
| HWSZX | SSGSX | HWSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.650 | 0.237 | 1,119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753M | 5.44B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.48 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.34 | -4.22 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 6.47 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.97 | 19.51 | 435% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement