HXGBF vs HXGBY
To understand the difference between Hexagon AB - Ordinary Shares - Class B (HXGBF) vs. Hexagon AB - ADR (HXGBY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class B and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HXGBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HXGBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HXGBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HXGBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HXGBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HXGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HXGBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +11.73% price change this week, while HXGBY (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -4.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
HXGBY is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-4.89% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| HXGBF | HXGBY | HXGBF / HXGBY | |
| Capitalization | 26B | 26B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 1.39B | 1.39B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -16.874 | -19.403 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.04 | 22.03 | 105% |
| Revenue | 5.37B | 5.37B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 505M | 505M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 4.32B | 4.32B | 100% |
HXGBF | HXGBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HXGBY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBF (22). This means that HXGBY’s stock grew similarly to HXGBF’s over the last 12 months.
HXGBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (73). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
HXGBF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (69). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
HXGBF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (54). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
HXGBF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (89). This means that HXGBF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.
| HXGBF | HXGBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 48% | 10 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FAIL | 16.25 | 0.03 | +0.18% |
| Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF | |||
| DDEC | 40.22 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| FT Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec | |||
| JIG | 65.88 | -0.07 | -0.11% |
| JPMorgan International Growth ETF | |||
| OEUR | 29.19 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| ALPS O'Shares Europe Quality Div ETF | |||
| PXF | 48.95 | -0.16 | -0.33% |
| Invesco FTSE RAFI Dev Mkts ex-US ETF | |||
HXGBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HXGBF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HXGBF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HXGBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HXGBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HXGBY - HXGBF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| SEPJF - HXGBF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| KRKNF - HXGBF | 10% Poorly correlated | -5.71% | ||
| SOBR - HXGBF | 9% Poorly correlated | -13.04% | ||
| CAZGF - HXGBF | 9% Poorly correlated | +3.64% | ||
More | ||||
HXGBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HXGBY has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HXGBY jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HXGBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HXGBY | 100% | -1.24% | ||
| NOVT - HXGBY | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| MKSI - HXGBY | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| FARO - HXGBY | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| FTV - HXGBY | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| KEYS - HXGBY | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||