HY
Price
$39.07
Change
+$0.75 (+1.96%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
11 days until earnings call
UGRO
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.99M
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HY vs UGRO

Header iconHY vs UGRO Comparison
Open Charts HY vs UGROBanner chart's image
Hyster-Yale
Price$39.07
Change+$0.75 (+1.96%)
Volume$1.56K
Capitalization1.12B
urban-gro
Price$0.49
Change+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.99M
HY vs UGRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
HY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UGRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HY vs. UGRO commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HY is a StrongBuy and UGRO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (HY: $38.32 vs. UGRO: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: HY and UGRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HY: 68% vs. UGRO: 97%
Market capitalization -- HY: $1.12B vs. UGRO: $15.99M
HY [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $1.12B. UGRO’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $15.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUGRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UGRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HY is a better buy in the long-term than UGRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UGRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UGRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HY is a better buy in the short-term than UGRO.

Price Growth

HY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +0.84% price change this week, while UGRO (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -27.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

HY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

UGRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+1.73% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HY($1.12B) has a higher market cap than UGRO($16M). UGRO has higher P/E ratio than HY: UGRO (129.87) vs HY (8.77). HY YTD gains are higher at: -22.686 vs. UGRO (-49.714). HY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 263M vs. UGRO (-16.61M). HY has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. UGRO (4.77M). UGRO has less debt than HY: UGRO (4.23M) vs HY (494M). HY has higher revenues than UGRO: HY (4.12B) vs UGRO (73.9M).
HYUGROHY / UGRO
Capitalization1.12B16M7,013%
EBITDA263M-16.61M-1,583%
Gain YTD-22.686-49.71446%
P/E Ratio8.77129.877%
Revenue4.12B73.9M5,572%
Total Cash78.8M4.77M1,652%
Total Debt494M4.23M11,681%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HY: Fundamental Ratings
HY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYUGRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UGRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIXIX9.33N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Index R6
DDVCX12.73N/A
N/A
Macquarie Value C
LKSCX18.21N/A
N/A
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
AGVEX22.85N/A
N/A
American Funds Global Insight F-1
OBEGX27.19N/A
N/A
Oberweis Global Opportunities Investor

HY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HY has been loosely correlated with AGCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HY jumps, then AGCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HY
1D Price
Change %
HY100%
+2.09%
AGCO - HY
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
REVG - HY
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.66%
MTW - HY
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.40%
TEX - HY
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.40%
CAT - HY
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.75%
More

UGRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UGRO and HY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UGRO and HY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UGRO
1D Price
Change %
UGRO100%
+2.41%
HY - UGRO
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
HYFM - UGRO
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
ASTE - UGRO
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
TEX - UGRO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
MTW - UGRO
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
More