HYFM
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.37 (+12.85%)
Updated
Sep 29, 02:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.42M
SCAG
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.10 (+3.77%)
Updated
Sep 29, 02:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYFM vs SCAG

Header iconHYFM vs SCAG Comparison
Open Charts HYFM vs SCAGBanner chart's image
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
Price$3.25
Change+$0.37 (+12.85%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization13.42M
Scage Future
Price$2.75
Change+$0.10 (+3.77%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
HYFM vs SCAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYFM vs. SCAG commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYFM is a StrongBuy and SCAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HYFM: $2.88 vs. SCAG: $2.65)
Brand notoriety: HYFM and SCAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYFM: 105% vs. SCAG: 2%
Market capitalization -- HYFM: $13.42M vs. SCAG: $0
HYFM [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $13.42M. SCAG’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $218.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $15.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYFM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYFM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCAG is a better buy in the long-term than HYFM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYFM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCAG is a better buy in the short-term than HYFM.

Price Growth

HYFM (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -10.84% price change this week, while SCAG (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -8.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-2.48% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYFM YTD gains are higher at: -50.345 vs. SCAG (-77.253).
HYFMSCAGHYFM / SCAG
Capitalization13.4MN/A-
EBITDA-17.62MN/A-
Gain YTD-50.345-77.25365%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue161MN/A-
Total Cash11MN/A-
Total Debt164MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYFMSCAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNP38.810.50
+1.31%
CenterPoint Energy
KMPR51.860.37
+0.72%
Kemper Corp
MED13.710.06
+0.44%
Medifast
GLBZ4.50N/A
N/A
Glen Burnie Bancorp
SENEB104.50-2.17
-2.03%
Seneca Foods Corp

HYFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYFM has been loosely correlated with ACA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYFM jumps, then ACA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYFM
1D Price
Change %
HYFM100%
-4.00%
ACA - HYFM
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
OSK - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
TEX - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
CNH - HYFM
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
CMCO - HYFM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More

SCAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCAG and KDK have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCAG and KDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCAG
1D Price
Change %
SCAG100%
-2.39%
KDK - SCAG
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
BNC - SCAG
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
HYFM - SCAG
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
GP - SCAG
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
XOS - SCAG
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More