HYG | SPHY | HYG / SPHY | |
Gain YTD | 7.316 | 7.299 | 100% |
Net Assets | 19.9B | 9.54B | 209% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.05 | 980% |
Turnover | 14.00 | 32.00 | 44% |
Yield | 5.70 | 7.43 | 77% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
HYG | SPHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago36% | 3 days ago38% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago45% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago48% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago51% | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago55% | 7 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | 3 days ago55% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HYG and SM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYG and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHY has been loosely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHY jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY | 100% | -0.08% | ||
BTE - SPHY | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.41% | ||
WFRD - SPHY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.98% |