| HYG | SPHY | HYG / SPHY | |
| Gain YTD | 6.889 | 6.812 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 10.1B | 177% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.05 | 980% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 52.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 5.71 | 7.44 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| HYG | SPHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 52% | 9 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 51% | 7 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HYG and SM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYG and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHY has been loosely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHY jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BTE - SPHY | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| WFRD - SPHY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.61% |