HYG | SPHY | HYG / SPHY | |
Gain YTD | 3.280 | 2.895 | 113% |
Net Assets | 16.6B | 8.39B | 198% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.05 | 980% |
Turnover | 14.00 | 32.00 | 44% |
Yield | 5.83 | 7.68 | 76% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
HYG | SPHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago42% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago55% | 17 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago54% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HYG and SM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYG and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHY has been loosely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHY jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY | 100% | -0.21% | ||
BTE - SPHY | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
WFRD - SPHY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.49% |