HYHDF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.57M
LNSTY
Price
$31.43
Change
-$0.59 (-1.84%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
66.32B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYHDF vs LNSTY

Header iconHYHDF vs LNSTY Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs LNSTYBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization11.57M
London Stock Exchange Group
Price$31.43
Change-$0.59 (-1.84%)
Volume$2.09M
Capitalization66.32B
HYHDF vs LNSTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYHDF vs. LNSTY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and LNSTY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.10 vs. LNSTY: $31.43)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and LNSTY are both not notable
HYHDF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while LNSTY is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 8% vs. LNSTY: 218%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $11.57M vs. LNSTY: $66.32B
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $11.57M. LNSTY’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $66.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSTY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNSTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYHDF is a better buy in the long-term than LNSTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYHDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNSTY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LNSTY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNSTY is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while LNSTY (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

LNSTY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.07% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.06% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSTY($66.3B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($11.6M). LNSTY has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: LNSTY (50.23) vs HYHDF (1.22). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 58.730 vs. LNSTY (-10.126). LNSTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.29B vs. HYHDF (1.25M). LNSTY has more cash in the bank: 769B vs. HYHDF (15.9M). HYHDF has less debt than LNSTY: HYHDF (5.94M) vs LNSTY (9.99B). LNSTY has higher revenues than HYHDF: LNSTY (9.14B) vs HYHDF (8.38M).
HYHDFLNSTYHYHDF / LNSTY
Capitalization11.6M66.3B0%
EBITDA1.25M4.29B0%
Gain YTD58.730-10.126-580%
P/E Ratio1.2250.232%
Revenue8.38M9.14B0%
Total Cash15.9M769B0%
Total Debt5.94M9.99B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYHDF vs LNSTY: Fundamental Ratings
HYHDF
LNSTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
598
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNSTY's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (69). This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

LNSTY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that LNSTY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNSTY (79). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LNSTY (100). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to LNSTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYHDFLNSTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNSTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCSG15.670.09
+0.58%
Healthcare Services Group
CLIR0.59N/A
+0.17%
ClearSign Technologies Corp
WM224.58-1.25
-0.55%
Waste Management
UBSI38.46-0.22
-0.57%
United Bankshares
AMBI4.50-0.43
-8.72%
Ambipar Emergency Response

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
N/A
PIHG - HYHDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPXGY - HYHDF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
EUXTF - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSTY - HYHDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
HKXCY - HYHDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More

LNSTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSTY has been loosely correlated with LDNXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSTY jumps, then LDNXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSTY
1D Price
Change %
LNSTY100%
-1.84%
LDNXF - LNSTY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
DBOEY - LNSTY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
MCO - LNSTY
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
MQBKY - LNSTY
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
DBOEF - LNSTY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
More