HYHDF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.69M
PIHG
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.64 (-36.57%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HYHDF vs PIHG

Header iconHYHDF vs PIHG Comparison
Open Charts HYHDF vs PIHGBanner chart's image
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$25.29K
Capitalization3.69M
Plural Industry Holding Group
Price$1.11
Change-$0.64 (-36.57%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
HYHDF vs PIHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HYHDF vs. PIHG commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYHDF is a Hold and PIHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HYHDF: $0.14 vs. PIHG: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: HYHDF and PIHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HYHDF: 81% vs. PIHG: 232%
Market capitalization -- HYHDF: $3.69M vs. PIHG: $0
HYHDF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.69M. PIHG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HYHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIHG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIHG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HYHDF is a better buy in the long-term than PIHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HYHDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIHG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PIHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIHG is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while PIHG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -26.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.99% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIHG YTD gains are higher at: 11000.001 vs. HYHDF (123.810).
HYHDFPIHGHYHDF / PIHG
Capitalization3.69MN/A-
EBITDA-22.02MN/A-
Gain YTD123.81011000.0011%
P/E Ratio0.59N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash6.21MN/A-
Total Debt6.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HYHDF vs PIHG: Fundamental Ratings
HYHDF
PIHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
77100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIHG's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (66). This means that PIHG’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

PIHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that PIHG’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as PIHG (100). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PIHG (34). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIHG (100). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HYHDFPIHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFU1.590.02
+1.60%
9F
VICI33.01N/A
N/A
VICI Properties
GRWG1.02N/A
N/A
GrowGeneration Corp
ECG71.53-1.54
-2.11%
Everus Construction Group Inc.
XMTR43.08-0.94
-2.14%
Xometry

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and PIHG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and PIHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
-2.87%
PIHG - HYHDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-36.57%
JPXGY - HYHDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
EUXTF - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSTY - HYHDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
HKXCY - HYHDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More

PIHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIHG and MNXBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIHG and MNXBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIHG
1D Price
Change %
PIHG100%
-36.57%
MNXBF - PIHG
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYHDF - PIHG
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
FNNTF - PIHG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEHSF - PIHG
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - PIHG
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More