Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HYMOX vs NHCCX
HYMOX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts HYMOX vs NHCCX
Lord Abbett High Income Muni Bond F3
Price$10.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.01B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
HYMOX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HYMOX vs. NHCCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYMOX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. HYMOX (4.02B). HYMOX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: HYMOX (5.09) vs NHCCX (4.69). HYMOX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: HYMOX (8 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than HYMOX (0.58). HYMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). HYMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: HYMOX (0) vs NHCCX (200). HYMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. NHCCX (-4.07). HYMOX return over 5 years is better than : 5.37 vs. NHCCX (3.25).
| HYMOX | NHCCX | HYMOX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.80 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.80 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.539 | -1.714 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 200 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.02B | 12.6B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.09 | 4.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.30 | -4.07 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.57 | 5.12 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.37 | 3.25 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers