HZO
Price
$22.29
Change
-$0.39 (-1.72%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
741.68M
88 days until earnings call
TBHC
Price
$1.23
Change
-$0.14 (-10.22%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
31.15M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HZO vs TBHC

Header iconHZO vs TBHC Comparison
Open Charts HZO vs TBHCBanner chart's image
MarineMax
Price$22.29
Change-$0.39 (-1.72%)
Volume$584.31K
Capitalization741.68M
THE BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE
Price$1.23
Change-$0.14 (-10.22%)
Volume$262.58K
Capitalization31.15M
HZO vs TBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HZO vs. TBHC commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HZO is a Hold and TBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (HZO: $22.29 vs. TBHC: $1.23)
Brand notoriety: HZO and TBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HZO: 169% vs. TBHC: 64%
Market capitalization -- HZO: $741.68M vs. TBHC: $31.15M
HZO [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $741.68M. TBHC’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $31.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HZO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HZO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HZO and TBHC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HZO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HZO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TBHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBHC is a better buy in the short-term than HZO.

Price Growth

HZO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while TBHC (@Specialty Stores) price change was -17.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -6.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

HZO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

TBHC is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-6.30% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HZO($742M) has a higher market cap than TBHC($31.1M). HZO has higher P/E ratio than TBHC: HZO (8.24) vs TBHC (4.79). HZO (-23.005) and TBHC (-24.074) have similar YTD gains . HZO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 226M vs. TBHC (-23.85M). HZO has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. TBHC (4.89M). TBHC has less debt than HZO: TBHC (198M) vs HZO (1.22B). HZO has higher revenues than TBHC: HZO (2.41B) vs TBHC (480M).
HZOTBHCHZO / TBHC
Capitalization742M31.1M2,386%
EBITDA226M-23.85M-948%
Gain YTD-23.005-24.07496%
P/E Ratio8.244.79172%
Revenue2.41B480M503%
Total Cash210M4.89M4,294%
Total Debt1.22B198M614%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HZO vs TBHC: Fundamental Ratings
HZO
TBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
81100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HZO's Valuation (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TBHC (52). This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TBHC (100). This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's SMR Rating (81) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TBHC (100). This means that HZO’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HZO (85). This means that TBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HZO’s over the last 12 months.

HZO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBHC (97). This means that HZO’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HZOTBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HZO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASERX118.99N/A
N/A
American Century Select R
HRCIX66.39N/A
N/A
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec I
SPMCX8.02N/A
N/A
Saratoga Mid Capitalization C
FBSOX53.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Enterprise Tech Svcs
TLACX12.00N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Core ESG A

TBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBHC
1D Price
Change %
TBHC100%
-10.22%
FLWS - TBHC
41%
Loosely correlated
-8.97%
RH - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
HZO - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
HNST - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
LE - TBHC
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
More