IACYF
Price
$9.88
Change
-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
KULR
Price
$2.08
Change
+$0.64 (+44.44%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

IACYF vs KULR

Header iconIACYF vs KULR Comparison
Open Charts IACYF vs KULRBanner chart's image
Inter Action Corp. Yokohama
Price$9.88
Change-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Volume$2
CapitalizationN/A
KULR Technology Group
Price$2.08
Change+$0.64 (+44.44%)
Volume$334.63K
CapitalizationN/A
IACYF vs KULR Comparison Chart
Loading...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IACYF vs. KULR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IACYF is a Buy and KULR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (IACYF: $9.88 vs. KULR: $2.08)
Brand notoriety: IACYF and KULR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IACYF: 100% vs. KULR: 443%
Market capitalization -- IACYF: $69.27M vs. KULR: $344.56M
IACYF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $69.27M. KULR’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $344.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $89.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IACYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKULR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IACYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IACYF is a better buy in the long-term than KULR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KULR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • KULR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

IACYF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KULR (@Electronic Components) price change was +70.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

KULR is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.37% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KULR($345M) has a higher market cap than IACYF($69.3M). KULR YTD gains are higher at: 678.378 vs. IACYF (29.999).
IACYFKULRIACYF / KULR
Capitalization69.3M345M20%
EBITDAN/A-14.49M-
Gain YTD29.999678.3784%
P/E Ratio13.61N/A-
RevenueN/A9.7M-
Total CashN/A912K-
Total DebtN/A2.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KULR: Fundamental Ratings
KULR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IACYFKULR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KULR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WB10.460.43
+4.29%
Weibo Corp
PALI1.900.06
+3.26%
Palisade Bio
ACR17.01-0.16
-0.93%
ACRES Commercial Realty Corp
WTRG37.99-0.36
-0.94%
Essential Utilities
TXO15.78-0.28
-1.74%
TXO Partners LP

IACYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IACYF and KULR have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IACYF and KULR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IACYF
1D Price
Change %
IACYF100%
N/A
KULR - IACYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
IEHC - IACYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
JNPKF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
-14.13%
IBIDF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KULR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KULR and APH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KULR and APH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KULR
1D Price
Change %
KULR100%
+0.70%
APH - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FLEX - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
PLXS - KULR
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
ALNT - KULR
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
VICR - KULR
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.44%
More