IACYF
Price
$9.88
Change
-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
102.73M
MNBEF
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IACYF vs MNBEF

Header iconIACYF vs MNBEF Comparison
Open Charts IACYF vs MNBEFBanner chart's image
Inter Action Corp. Yokohama
Price$9.88
Change-$0.54 (-5.18%)
Volume$2
Capitalization102.73M
Minebea Mitsumi
Price$14.05
Change-$0.14 (-0.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.11B
IACYF vs MNBEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IACYF vs. MNBEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IACYF is a Hold and MNBEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IACYF: $9.88 vs. MNBEF: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: IACYF and MNBEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IACYF: 100% vs. MNBEF: 94%
Market capitalization -- IACYF: $102.73M vs. MNBEF: $6.11B
IACYF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $102.73M. MNBEF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IACYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNBEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IACYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNBEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IACYF is a better buy in the long-term than MNBEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNBEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MNBEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

IACYF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNBEF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNBEF($6.11B) has a higher market cap than IACYF($103M). MNBEF (13.66) and IACYF (13.61) have similar P/E ratio . IACYF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MNBEF (-12.187). MNBEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. IACYF (2.56B). MNBEF has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. IACYF (8.31B). IACYF has less debt than MNBEF: IACYF (777M) vs MNBEF (419B). MNBEF has higher revenues than IACYF: MNBEF (1.51T) vs IACYF (8.82B).
IACYFMNBEFIACYF / MNBEF
Capitalization103M6.11B2%
EBITDA2.56B158B2%
Gain YTD0.000-12.187-
P/E Ratio13.6113.66100%
Revenue8.82B1.51T1%
Total Cash8.31B168B5%
Total Debt777M419B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNBEF: Fundamental Ratings
MNBEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IACYFMNBEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNBEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEF6.010.07
+1.18%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.
EFIV59.270.47
+0.80%
SPDR® S&P 500® ESG ETF
CALI50.34N/A
N/A
iShares Short-Term CA Muni Act ETF
EBIZ30.61N/A
N/A
Global X E-commerce ETF
JDOC49.49N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF

IACYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IACYF and KULR have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IACYF and KULR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IACYF
1D Price
Change %
IACYF100%
N/A
KULR - IACYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
IEHC - IACYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
MNBEF - IACYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNBEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNBEF and AITUY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNBEF and AITUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNBEF
1D Price
Change %
MNBEF100%
N/A
AITUY - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRSEF - MNBEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IEHC - MNBEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - MNBEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
JNNDF - MNBEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More