IAFNF
Price
$114.87
Change
+$0.67 (+0.59%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.65B
MPFRF
Price
$4.13
Change
+$0.53 (+14.72%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
14.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAFNF vs MPFRF

Header iconIAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison
Open Charts IAFNF vs MPFRFBanner chart's image
IA FINL
Price$114.87
Change+$0.67 (+0.59%)
Volume$32.83K
Capitalization10.65B
Mapfre SA
Price$4.13
Change+$0.53 (+14.72%)
Volume$1.51K
Capitalization14.57B
IAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison Chart in %
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAFNF vs. MPFRF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAFNF is a StrongBuy and MPFRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IAFNF: $114.87 vs. MPFRF: $4.13)
Brand notoriety: IAFNF and MPFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAFNF: 20% vs. MPFRF: 302%
Market capitalization -- IAFNF: $10.65B vs. MPFRF: $14.57B
IAFNF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $10.65B. MPFRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $14.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $33.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAFNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPFRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPFRF is a better buy in the long-term than IAFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAFNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPFRF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAFNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPFRF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the short-term than MPFRF.

Price Growth

IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +4.60% price change this week, while MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.01% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPFRF($14.6B) has a higher market cap than IAFNF($10.7B). IAFNF has higher P/E ratio than MPFRF: IAFNF (14.98) vs MPFRF (10.19). MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 54.972 vs. IAFNF (24.305). MPFRF has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. IAFNF (2.21B). IAFNF has less debt than MPFRF: IAFNF (1.5B) vs MPFRF (3.11B). MPFRF has higher revenues than IAFNF: MPFRF (26B) vs IAFNF (4.95B).
IAFNFMPFRFIAFNF / MPFRF
Capitalization10.7B14.6B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.30554.97244%
P/E Ratio14.9810.19147%
Revenue4.95B26B19%
Total Cash2.21B25B9%
Total Debt1.5B3.11B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPFRF: Fundamental Ratings
MPFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAFNFMPFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLOF52.060.17
+0.33%
iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
GYLD13.250.03
+0.24%
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
BUFR33.45-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
KORP47.60-0.04
-0.08%
American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF
QDVO28.96-0.09
-0.31%
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and BBSEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and BBSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
+0.59%
BBSEY - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
AXAHY - IAFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
AXAHF - IAFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - IAFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHEY - IAFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
More

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and BLHEY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and BLHEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
BBSEY - MPFRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
BLHEF - MPFRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAFNF - MPFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
GIVSY - MPFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More