IAFNF
Price
$106.68
Change
-$1.48 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
7.14B
MPFRF
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAFNF vs MPFRF

Header iconIAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison
Open Charts IAFNF vs MPFRFBanner chart's image
IA FINL
Price$106.68
Change-$1.48 (-1.37%)
Volume$205
Capitalization7.14B
Mapfre SA
Price$3.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$190
Capitalization6.38B
IAFNF vs MPFRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAFNF vs. MPFRF commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAFNF is a Buy and MPFRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (IAFNF: $106.68 vs. MPFRF: $3.60)
Brand notoriety: IAFNF and MPFRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAFNF: 76% vs. MPFRF: 42%
Market capitalization -- IAFNF: $7.14B vs. MPFRF: $6.38B
IAFNF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $7.14B. MPFRF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAFNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPFRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPFRF is a better buy in the long-term than IAFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAFNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPFRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAFNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPFRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IAFNF and MPFRF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.09% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IAFNF($7.14B) has a higher market cap than MPFRF($6.39B). IAFNF (8.68) and MPFRF (8.55) have similar P/E ratio . MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 35.084 vs. IAFNF (15.442). MPFRF (1.99B) and IAFNF (1.95B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . IAFNF has less debt than MPFRF: IAFNF (1.5B) vs MPFRF (3.32B). MPFRF has higher revenues than IAFNF: MPFRF (22.3B) vs IAFNF (12.9B).
IAFNFMPFRFIAFNF / MPFRF
Capitalization7.14B6.39B112%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.44235.08444%
P/E Ratio8.688.55101%
Revenue12.9B22.3B58%
Total Cash1.95B1.99B98%
Total Debt1.5B3.32B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPFRF: Fundamental Ratings
MPFRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
27
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAFNFMPFRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHRT7.920.04
+0.51%
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
QCOC21.240.05
+0.24%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct
BKF41.19-0.23
-0.56%
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
INCO64.33-0.57
-0.88%
Columbia India Consumer ETF
BULZ168.25-6.58
-3.76%
MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and BBSEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and BBSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
-1.37%
BBSEY - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
AXAHY - IAFNF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
AXAHF - IAFNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPFRF - IAFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISF - IAFNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and BLHEY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and BLHEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBSEY - MPFRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
BLHEF - MPFRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAFNF - MPFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
GIVSY - MPFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
+19.80%
More