IAUGF
Price
$5.52
Change
-$0.35 (-5.96%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
9.69B
IFCZF
Price
$222.21
Change
-$1.06 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAUGF vs IFCZF

Header iconIAUGF vs IFCZF Comparison
Open Charts IAUGF vs IFCZFBanner chart's image
Insurance Australia Group
Price$5.52
Change-$0.35 (-5.96%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization9.69B
Intact Financial
Price$222.21
Change-$1.06 (-0.47%)
Volume$5.01K
Capitalization25.76B
IAUGF vs IFCZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAUGF vs. IFCZF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAUGF is a StrongBuy and IFCZF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IAUGF: $5.55 vs. IFCZF: $222.95)
Brand notoriety: IAUGF and IFCZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAUGF: 19% vs. IFCZF: 1%
Market capitalization -- IAUGF: $9.69B vs. IFCZF: $25.76B
IAUGF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $9.69B. IFCZF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $25.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAUGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFCZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the long-term than IAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAUGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFCZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAUGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than IAUGF.

Price Growth

IAUGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.25% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFCZF($25.8B) has a higher market cap than IAUGF($9.69B). IAUGF has higher P/E ratio than IFCZF: IAUGF (24.27) vs IFCZF (15.20). IFCZF YTD gains are higher at: 22.380 vs. IAUGF (2.968). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. IAUGF (350M). IAUGF has less debt than IFCZF: IAUGF (2.55B) vs IFCZF (5.43B). IFCZF has higher revenues than IAUGF: IFCZF (21.2B) vs IAUGF (9.17B).
IAUGFIFCZFIAUGF / IFCZF
Capitalization9.69B25.8B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.96822.38013%
P/E Ratio24.2715.20160%
Revenue9.17B21.2B43%
Total Cash350M15.8B2%
Total Debt2.55B5.43B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAUGF vs IFCZF: Fundamental Ratings
IAUGF
IFCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
734
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8672
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IAUGF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (74). This means that IAUGF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IAUGF (73). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUGF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (96). This means that IAUGF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (53). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (86). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAUGFIFCZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
25%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XVV49.140.22
+0.46%
iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
FLRN30.850.03
+0.10%
SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF
EGUS48.47N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
AOHY11.14-0.02
-0.18%
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
GLNK34.50-0.50
-1.43%
Grayscale Chainlink Trust (LINK)

IAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAUGF and IFCZF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAUGF and IFCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAUGF
1D Price
Change %
IAUGF100%
+0.54%
IFCZF - IAUGF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
NHOLF - IAUGF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPCCY - IAUGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSADF - IAUGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
IAUGY - IAUGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
+0.34%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More