IAUGF
Price
$5.55
Change
+$0.03 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.59B
NHOLF
Price
$31.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.80%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
28.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAUGF vs NHOLF

Header iconIAUGF vs NHOLF Comparison
Open Charts IAUGF vs NHOLFBanner chart's image
Insurance Australia Group
Price$5.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.54%)
Volume$551
Capitalization12.59B
Sompo
Price$31.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.80%)
Volume$100
Capitalization28.37B
IAUGF vs NHOLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IAUGF vs. NHOLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAUGF is a Hold and NHOLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IAUGF: $5.55 vs. NHOLF: $31.00)
Brand notoriety: IAUGF and NHOLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAUGF: 85% vs. NHOLF: 44%
Market capitalization -- IAUGF: $12.59B vs. NHOLF: $28.37B
IAUGF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $12.59B. NHOLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $28.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $142.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAUGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNHOLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • IAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NHOLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHOLF is a better buy in the long-term than IAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAUGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHOLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAUGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NHOLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAUGF is a better buy in the short-term than NHOLF.

Price Growth

IAUGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NHOLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -10.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHOLF($28.4B) has a higher market cap than IAUGF($12.6B). NHOLF has higher P/E ratio than IAUGF: NHOLF (18.24) vs IAUGF (14.63). NHOLF YTD gains are higher at: 23.832 vs. IAUGF (2.968). NHOLF has more cash in the bank: 1.16T vs. IAUGF (703M). IAUGF has less debt than NHOLF: IAUGF (2.96B) vs NHOLF (694B). NHOLF has higher revenues than IAUGF: NHOLF (5.15T) vs IAUGF (14.9B).
IAUGFNHOLFIAUGF / NHOLF
Capitalization12.6B28.4B44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.96823.83212%
P/E Ratio14.6318.2480%
Revenue14.9B5.15T0%
Total Cash703M1.16T0%
Total Debt2.96B694B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAUGF vs NHOLF: Fundamental Ratings
IAUGF
NHOLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4594
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5928
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NHOLF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (49). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as IAUGF (59). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (100). This means that IAUGF’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

IAUGF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (60). This means that IAUGF’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IAUGF (78). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew significantly faster than IAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAUGFNHOLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMRE12.720.03
+0.24%
Costamare
PGACU10.45N/A
N/A
Pantages Capital Acquisition Corporation
CGNX44.87-0.65
-1.43%
Cognex Corp
RDI1.51-0.07
-4.43%
Reading International
IMRX8.00-1.23
-13.33%
Immuneering Corp

IAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAUGF and IFCZF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAUGF and IFCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAUGF
1D Price
Change %
IAUGF100%
N/A
IFCZF - IAUGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
NHOLF - IAUGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
PPCCY - IAUGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
MSADF - IAUGF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUGY - IAUGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.57%
More

NHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHOLF and IFCZF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHOLF and IFCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHOLF
1D Price
Change %
NHOLF100%
-0.80%
IFCZF - NHOLF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
IAUGF - NHOLF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSADY - NHOLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
PPCCY - NHOLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
MSADF - NHOLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More