Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$35.96
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.84B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. IBALX (1.45B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (2.08) vs IBALX (1.49). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. IBALX (5.83). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.77 vs. IBALX (21.52).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.569 | 9.101 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 2.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 10.48 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 32.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | 38.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.78 | 68.01 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement