Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBALX vs RLBFX
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBALX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
Price$37.17
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.03
Change-$0.14 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.55B
IBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBALX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. IBALX (1.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBALX: RLBFX (2.00) vs IBALX (1.39). IBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBALX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBALX (0.97) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBALX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBALX: RLBFX (250) vs IBALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. IBALX (4.65). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.76 vs. IBALX (24.54).
| IBALX | RLBFX | IBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.29 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.238 | 14.743 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 267B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 2.00 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 9.41 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.39 | 53.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.54 | 43.76 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.13 | 79.88 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement