IBIDF
Price
$35.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
5.05B
JPDYY
Price
$1.18
Change
+$0.04 (+3.51%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
431.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBIDF vs JPDYY

Header iconIBIDF vs JPDYY Comparison
Open Charts IBIDF vs JPDYYBanner chart's image
Ibiden
Price$35.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.05B
Japan Display
Price$1.18
Change+$0.04 (+3.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization431.81M
IBIDF vs JPDYY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBIDF vs. JPDYY commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBIDF is a Hold and JPDYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (IBIDF: $35.10 vs. JPDYY: $1.18)
Brand notoriety: IBIDF and JPDYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBIDF: 15% vs. JPDYY: 100%
Market capitalization -- IBIDF: $5.05B vs. JPDYY: $431.81M
IBIDF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $5.05B. JPDYY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $431.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $103.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBIDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJPDYY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBIDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JPDYY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBIDF is a better buy in the long-term than JPDYY.

Price Growth

IBIDF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JPDYY (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

JPDYY is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.09% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBIDF($5.05B) has a higher market cap than JPDYY($432M). IBIDF YTD gains are higher at: 13.409 vs. JPDYY (3.509). IBIDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94.6B vs. JPDYY (-24.23B). IBIDF has more cash in the bank: 374B vs. JPDYY (24.3B). JPDYY has less debt than IBIDF: JPDYY (44B) vs IBIDF (343B). IBIDF has higher revenues than JPDYY: IBIDF (364B) vs JPDYY (222B).
IBIDFJPDYYIBIDF / JPDYY
Capitalization5.05B432M1,169%
EBITDA94.6B-24.23B-390%
Gain YTD13.4093.509382%
P/E Ratio22.31N/A-
Revenue364B222B164%
Total Cash374B24.3B1,539%
Total Debt343B44B780%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBIDF vs JPDYY: Fundamental Ratings
IBIDF
JPDYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
10100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6247
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBIDF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JPDYY (79). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JPDYY’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as JPDYY (100). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew similarly to JPDYY’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JPDYY (100). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew significantly faster than JPDYY’s over the last 12 months.

IBIDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as JPDYY (55). This means that IBIDF’s stock grew similarly to JPDYY’s over the last 12 months.

JPDYY's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as IBIDF (62). This means that JPDYY’s stock grew similarly to IBIDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIGCX17.960.05
+0.28%
Calamos International Growth C
MSGQX16.24N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars C
WFMIX46.50N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Inst
PXQSX24.72N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value I
DDVRX13.36-0.03
-0.22%
Macquarie Value R

IBIDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBIDF and HNHPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBIDF and HNHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBIDF
1D Price
Change %
IBIDF100%
N/A
HNHPF - IBIDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
IEHC - IBIDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
KULR - IBIDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGBLY - IBIDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IBIDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JPDYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JPDYY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JPDYY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPDYY
1D Price
Change %
JPDYY100%
N/A
IEHC - JPDYY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
JNPKF - JPDYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - JPDYY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGBLY - JPDYY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBIDF - JPDYY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More