IBJHF
Price
$2.06
Change
+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
748.2M
LKSGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
64.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBJHF vs LKSGF

Header iconIBJHF vs LKSGF Comparison
Open Charts IBJHF vs LKSGFBanner chart's image
Ibstock
Price$2.06
Change+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization748.2M
Luks Group Vietnam Holdings
Price$0.01
Change-$0.07 (-87.50%)
Volume$240
Capitalization64.62M
IBJHF vs LKSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBJHF vs. LKSGF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBJHF is a Hold and LKSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (IBJHF: $2.06 vs. LKSGF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: IBJHF and LKSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBJHF: 100% vs. LKSGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- IBJHF: $748.2M vs. LKSGF: $64.62M
IBJHF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $748.2M. LKSGF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $64.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBJHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLKSGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IBJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LKSGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBJHF is a better buy in the long-term than LKSGF.

Price Growth

IBJHF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LKSGF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.95% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBJHF($748M) has a higher market cap than LKSGF($64.6M). IBJHF has higher P/E ratio than LKSGF: IBJHF (39.92) vs LKSGF (2.06). IBJHF YTD gains are higher at: 42.069 vs. LKSGF (-88.235).
IBJHFLKSGFIBJHF / LKSGF
Capitalization748M64.6M1,158%
EBITDA66.8MN/A-
Gain YTD42.069-88.235-48%
P/E Ratio39.922.061,936%
Revenue381MN/A-
Total Cash22.6MN/A-
Total Debt200MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBJHF vs LKSGF: Fundamental Ratings
IBJHF
LKSGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
9088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5292
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LKSGF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (11). This means that LKSGF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LKSGF (100). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew similarly to LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

LKSGF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (90). This means that LKSGF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKSGF (92). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LKSGF (100). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than LKSGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBJHFLKSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMNX213.54N/A
N/A
Rydex Precious Metals A
JCVSX25.37N/A
N/A
JHancock Classic Value R2
NLSIX20.01N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
VCULX19.29N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Growth
SROCX13.51-0.09
-0.66%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs C

IBJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBJHF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBJHF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBJHF
1D Price
Change %
IBJHF100%
N/A
SMID - IBJHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
CTXXF - IBJHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
HCMLF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
LKSGF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LKSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LKSGF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LKSGF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKSGF
1D Price
Change %
LKSGF100%
N/A
SMID - LKSGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
IBJHF - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSGTY - LKSGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - LKSGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JHIUF - LKSGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
More