IBJHF
Price
$2.06
Change
+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
706.53M
SMID
Price
$41.80
Change
+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
221.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

IBJHF vs SMID

Header iconIBJHF vs SMID Comparison
Open Charts IBJHF vs SMIDBanner chart's image
Ibstock
Price$2.06
Change+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization706.53M
Smith-Midland
Price$41.80
Change+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization221.73M
IBJHF vs SMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IBJHF vs. SMID commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBJHF is a Hold and SMID is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (IBJHF: $2.06 vs. SMID: $41.80)
Brand notoriety: IBJHF and SMID are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IBJHF: 100% vs. SMID: 58%
Market capitalization -- IBJHF: $706.53M vs. SMID: $221.73M
IBJHF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $706.53M. SMID’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $221.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IBJHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMID’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IBJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IBJHF and SMID are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMID’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

IBJHF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMID (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBJHF($707M) has a higher market cap than SMID($222M). IBJHF has higher P/E ratio than SMID: IBJHF (39.92) vs SMID (18.41). IBJHF YTD gains are higher at: 42.069 vs. SMID (-5.983). IBJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66.8M vs. SMID (18.4M). IBJHF has more cash in the bank: 22.6M vs. SMID (7.1M). SMID has less debt than IBJHF: SMID (4.86M) vs IBJHF (200M). IBJHF has higher revenues than SMID: IBJHF (381M) vs SMID (91M).
IBJHFSMIDIBJHF / SMID
Capitalization707M222M318%
EBITDA66.8M18.4M363%
Gain YTD42.069-5.983-703%
P/E Ratio39.9218.41217%
Revenue381M91M419%
Total Cash22.6M7.1M318%
Total Debt200M4.86M4,114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBJHF vs SMID: Fundamental Ratings
IBJHF
SMID
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4782
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
8934
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1193
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBJHF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (72). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBJHF (100). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBJHF (89). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (46). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMID (93). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBJHFSMID
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLACX85.20N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel C
DLHCX22.05N/A
N/A
Macquarie Healthcare C
DIFIX12.47N/A
N/A
MFS Diversified Income I
MUNDX27.97N/A
N/A
Mundoval
GURCX31.98N/A
N/A
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate C

IBJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBJHF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBJHF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBJHF
1D Price
Change %
IBJHF100%
N/A
SMID - IBJHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
CTXXF - IBJHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
HCMLF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
MCEM - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
LKSGF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.06%
BCC - SMID
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
USLM - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
KNF - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXP - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More