Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBAX
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$36.14
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. IBLLX (1.5B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBAX (1.10) vs IBLLX (0.73). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBAX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. IBLLX (4.63). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. IBLLX (21.00).
| IBLLX | RLBAX | IBLLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.544 | 13.770 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | 9.12 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.18 | 47.98 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.00 | 38.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.77 | 68.72 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement