Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBAX
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$35.51
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.34
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. IBLLX (1.46B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBAX (1.17) vs IBLLX (0.83). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBAX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. IBLLX (2.97). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.12 vs. IBLLX (16.51).
| IBLLX | RLBAX | IBLLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.867 | 10.068 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 255B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.17 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | 7.23 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.42 | 32.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.51 | 33.12 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.72 | 66.60 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement