Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBAX
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$33.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. IBLLX (1.39B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBAX (1.23) vs IBLLX (0.90). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBAX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.30 vs. IBLLX (0.58). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.57 vs. IBLLX (17.67).
| IBLLX | RLBAX | IBLLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.367 | 4.364 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 243B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.23 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 6.30 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.36 | 20.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.67 | 30.57 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.57 | 52.75 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement