Ad is loading...
IBLLX vs RLBAX
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBAX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$33.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.54B
IBLLX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 239B vs. IBLLX (1.38B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBAX (1.28) vs IBLLX (0.93). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBAX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.31 vs. IBLLX (1.55). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.80 vs. IBLLX (24.93).
| IBLLX | RLBAX | IBLLX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.31 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.212 | 1.980 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 239B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.28 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 5.31 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.55 | 20.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.93 | 36.80 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.94 | 46.23 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...