Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBFX
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$33.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.91
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.43B
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 243B vs. IBLLX (1.39B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBFX (2.18) vs IBLLX (0.90). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBFX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. IBLLX (0.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.46 vs. IBLLX (17.67).
| IBLLX | RLBFX | IBLLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.367 | 4.819 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 243B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 7.43 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.36 | 23.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.67 | 36.46 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.57 | 62.07 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement