Ad is loading...
IBLLX vs RLBFX
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$33.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.54B
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 239B vs. IBLLX (1.38B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBFX (2.26) vs IBLLX (0.93). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBFX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. IBLLX (1.55). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.91 vs. IBLLX (24.93).
| IBLLX | RLBFX | IBLLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.212 | 2.338 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 239B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 2.26 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 6.44 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.55 | 23.54 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.93 | 42.91 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.94 | 55.17 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...