Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBFX
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$34.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.93
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.37B
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. IBLLX (1.43B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBFX (2.10) vs IBLLX (0.84). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBFX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.38 vs. IBLLX (1.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.71 vs. IBLLX (20.54).
| IBLLX | RLBFX | IBLLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.491 | 8.281 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 2.10 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.58 | 7.38 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.26 | 37.11 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.54 | 40.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.56 | 65.29 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement