Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBLLX vs RLBFX
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBLLX vs RLBFX
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced C
Price$35.90
Change+$0.07 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
IBLLX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBLLX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBLLX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. IBLLX (1.49B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBLLX: RLBFX (1.97) vs IBLLX (0.72). IBLLX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBLLX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). IBLLX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. IBLLX (41.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBLLX: RLBFX (250) vs IBLLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. IBLLX (1.79). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. IBLLX (17.06).
| IBLLX | RLBFX | IBLLX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.324 | 14.331 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.97 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 9.32 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 42.18 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.06 | 40.53 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.90 | 74.39 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement