Ad is loading...
IBNAX vs RLBEX
IBNAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBEX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$22.51
Change+$0.18 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.06
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
IBNAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. IBNAX (1.41B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBEX (1.97) vs IBNAX (1.01). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: IBNAX (37 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). IBNAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. IBNAX (73.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBEX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). IBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. RLBEX (0.89). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.33 vs. IBNAX (9.38).
| IBNAX | RLBEX | IBNAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.60 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.60 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.884 | -3.234 | 151% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 224B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.97 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.14 | 0.89 | 467% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.09 | 10.36 | -59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.38 | 35.33 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.25 | 47.53 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...