Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IBNAX vs RLBFX
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts IBNAX vs RLBFX
Macquarie Balanced Fund
Price$24.73
Change+$0.11 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.57
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.42B
IBNAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IBNAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBNAX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. IBNAX (1.59B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than IBNAX: RLBFX (2.18) vs IBNAX (0.98). IBNAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: IBNAX (38 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). IBNAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). IBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IBNAX: RLBFX (250) vs IBNAX (1000). IBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. RLBFX (7.90). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.86 vs. IBNAX (13.18).
| IBNAX | RLBFX | IBNAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.29 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.770 | 7.138 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 249B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 2.18 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 7.90 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.55 | 35.14 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.18 | 44.86 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.55 | 67.01 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement